
If you’ve spent even five minutes researching laser tattoo removal online, you’ve probably seen it:
A technician doing multiple rapid passes over the same tattoo while using a clear gel-like “PFD patch,” and the tattoo turning dark black as if the ink is being pulled straight out of the skin.
It looks impressive.
It looks advanced.
And it’s heavily marketed as a way to reduce the number of sessions needed for complete tattoo removal.
But here’s the truth:
PFD patches don’t work the way they’re advertised.
At INKLESS, we believe clients deserve real education—not marketing hype. So let’s break down exactly what these patches are, what they claim to do, and why they often lead to more pain, longer healing, and no real improvement in results.
PFD stands for Perfluorodecalin, a substance that has been used in medical settings for decades.
In tattoo removal, the PFD patch is marketed as a tool that allows technicians to perform multiple laser passes in one session by reducing visible “frosting” on the surface of the skin.
In other words, it’s designed to clear the cloudy white reaction that appears during laser tattoo removal so the laser can keep firing into the same area repeatedly.
Sounds great in theory.
But the problem is: frosting isn’t just happening on the surface.
When laser tattoo removal is performed, the tattoo pigment is heated and fractured into smaller particles.
This creates a reaction called:
The surface frosting may fade quickly, but the internal frosting and cavitation reaction can last 48–72 hours.
That means the real issue is not what you see on the outside—it’s what’s happening underneath the skin.
And no patch can magically stop or reverse that internal response.
So even if a PFD patch clears the surface appearance of frosting, it does nothing to reduce the internal blockage that’s preventing the laser energy from penetrating deeper.
The entire marketing pitch behind PFD patches is this:
“Multiple passes in one session means more ink gets broken down per visit, so fewer treatments are needed overall.”
But after extensive testing, we’ve found the opposite.
Multiple passes do not reduce the number of treatments needed.
What they do increase is:
In many cases, the second and third passes are not actually doing meaningful work—because the internal frosting from the first pass is already interfering with absorption.
So instead of improving results, you’re simply creating more irritation for the client.
Here’s another issue that doesn’t get discussed enough:
The patch itself has thickness.
And depending on the wavelength being used, that patch can reduce penetration.
Instead of helping the laser energy reach the dermis (where the majority of tattoo pigment resides), it can act like a barrier—essentially functioning like a silicone pad.
In real-world practice, it behaves less like a breakthrough technology and more like:
a very expensive hydrogel bandage.
This is the part that shocks most people.
In viral videos, the patch often turns black, and it’s marketed as proof that ink is being “pulled out.”
But that black residue is not tattoo ink.
It’s carbon.
It’s a chemical byproduct created when the laser heats the ingredients of the patch itself.
It’s the same concept as producing carbon by burning:
This is essentially the same crude process that has historically been used to make certain pigment types (including low-grade tattoo pigments and improvised inks).
So the black “ink removal” effect is really just:
heat + patch ingredients = carbon residue
Not ink extraction.
It’s visual theater.
One of the most misleading things technicians notice is that after the first pass, the second pass often feels “easier” or less painful.
But that’s not because the laser is working better.
It’s because internal frosting is already blocking penetration.
A simple test proves this:
Most clients will report the second pass feels different or less intense.
That’s not increased efficiency.
That’s reduced absorption.
PFD patches have become popular because they look impressive.
They create viral content.
They allow clinics to claim:
But clinically, these claims don’t hold up in practice.
Instead, clients are often put through:
All for the same outcome they would’ve achieved with a properly spaced, correctly performed treatment plan.
PFD patches were designed to remove surface frosting so multiple passes could be performed.
But internal frosting lasts 48–72 hours, and the patch does nothing to reduce that internal reaction.
In real practice, PFD patches:
✅ Clear surface frosting
❌ Do not reduce internal cavitation
❌ Do not reduce total treatments needed
❌ Increase pain and irritation
❌ Extend healing times
❌ Can block laser penetration
❌ Provide no benefit to pigment metabolism
At the end of the day, tattoo removal is not about what looks good on camera.
It’s about what produces the safest and most effective outcome for the client.
Instead of relying on trendy patches, the biggest factors that determine tattoo removal success are:
Tattoo removal is a biological process—not a hack.
The laser breaks pigment down.
The body does the real removal.
At INKLESS, we focus on evidence-based treatment strategies that protect the skin, respect healing timelines, and maximize long-term outcomes.
If a tool doesn’t improve results in real clinical testing, we don’t use it—no matter how good it looks on TikTok.
Because your skin deserves more than marketing.
Have a question about your tattoo or curious about your options? Send us a message and one of our experts will personally guide you toward the safest, most effective next step.